Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00480
Original file (BC 2014 00480.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF: 	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00480
					COUNSEL:  NONE
		HEARING DESIRED:  NO 


APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

1.  His records be changed to reflect that he declined an election 
for spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP).

2.  He be credited for the SBP premiums withheld from his retired 
pay account.


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He does not want the SBP premiums taken out of his monthly 
retirement check.  His spouse is a retired colonel and he did not 
request spouse SBP coverage.  

He retired and did not receive any pay and/or information 
regarding his pay until January 2013.  Defense Finance and 
Accounting Service (DFAS), stated he should get paid in February 
2013, less the SBP deduction.

The applicant did not provide any documentation in support of his 
request.

The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 30 Nov 13, the applicant retired from the Air Force Reserve 
(USAFR). 


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

DFAS makes no recommendation.  In accordance with Title 10, United 
States Code (USC), section 1448(a), a participant in SBP may elect 
to discontinue participation during the 25th through the 36th month 
after commencement of payment of retired pay.  In order to 
discontinue participation in the SBP, completion of DD Form 2656-
2, Survivor Benefit Plan Termination Request is required under the 
provisions of 10 USC, section 1448(a).


The complete DFAS evaluation is at Exhibit C.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

He states the DFAS advisory opinion is correct.  However, he was 
not fully aware of what SBP was when he signed the form.  His mind 
was not in the right place because his unit was busy changing over 
from the C-5 to the C-17 airframe.  He takes full responsibility 
for his actions; however, his spouse is a retired colonel and has 
her own financial support in the event something should happen to 
him.

The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit E.


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice to warrant 
correcting his record to show that he declined SBP coverage or to 
credit him for SBP premiums withheld from his retired pay.  We 
note the applicant states he was not fully aware of what SBP was 
when he signed the form and states his mind was not in the right 
place, however, we do not find his comments sufficiently 
persuasive.  Therefore, we conclude the applicant has failed to 
sustain his burden of proof that he has been the victim of an 
error or injustice.  As pointed out by the OPR, the applicant may 
elect to discontinue participation during the 25th through the 36th 
month after commencement of payment of retired pay. In view of the 
above and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no 
basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application.  


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly 
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. 


?
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 
BC-2014-00480 in Executive Session on 17 Feb 15, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	Panel Chair
	Member
	Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 29 Jan 14.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Available Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Letter, DFAS, dated 1 Apr 14.
Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 4 Apr 14.
Exhibit E.  Letter, Applicant, dated 30 Apr 14.

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04851

    Original file (BC 2013 04851.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DFAS indicates that according to the law, they cannot discontinue the applicant’s SBP coverage. The evidence indicates the applicant did not make an SBP election by completing a DD Form 2656 prior to his retirement; therefore, since he was married at the time of his retirement, automatic coverage was established. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 2 May 14.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03865

    Original file (BC 2014 03865.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was not aware the ARPC Form 123, Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate, he signed on 14 Sep 94 requesting RCSBP spouse coverage would be used for retirement since he was not yet retired. We note the applicant did not request his RCSBP election for spouse coverage be terminated within 90 days of notification of eligibility for Reserve component retired pay IAW 10 U.S.C. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00657

    Original file (BC-2006-00657.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provided a copy of the DD Form 2656-2 dated 30 Jun 98. Applicant provided a statement from his spouse, concurring with his request to terminate RCSBP. We note that the applicant’s spouse has submitted a statement concurring in the permanent revocation of her SBP coverage currently in effect; however, the eligibility period for this action was between the 25th and 36th month following the effective date of his retirement.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002751

    Original file (20150002751.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states he was medically retired from the Army on 26 December 2013. The portion of a VA rating decision he provided that increased his PTSD rating to 100% specifically stated the medical evidence showed he was competent to manage his financial affairs.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003413

    Original file (20130003413.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Prior to his retirement, the applicant completed his DD Form 2656 and elected spouse and children coverage based on the full amount of his retired pay. Although this is not necessarily the Army's fault and there is no error in his records, since he applied immediately and his spouse has concurred with the decision to terminate SBP enrollment, as a matter of equity only, his records should be corrected to show he made an election to decline participation at the time he retired and his spouse...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009842

    Original file (20120009842.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A letter from the DFAS Retired and Annuitant Pay Department, dated 27 January 2012, shows the applicant was advised in accordance with the Physical Disability Board of Review's recommendation his military record had been corrected to reflect that he was placed on the Permanent Disability Retired List effective 9 October 2009. The law allows a participating member to elect to discontinue participation by submitting a DD Form 2656-2 during the period that is more than 2 years but less than 3...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01931

    Original file (BC 2014 01931.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    When his former spouse died, he has letters from DFAS informing him, “when there is no eligible spouse beneficiary (which he believes is the case because his former spouse is not alive to be a beneficiary), the law provides the following options (1) Resume coverage with annuity and cost amounts increased by applicable cost-of-living increases; (2) Increase coverage up to and including your full retired pay; or, (3) Elect not to have the spouse portion of coverage resumed.” For a brief...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070001685

    Original file (20070001685.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    Although the DD Form 2656 identifies the applicant's spouse by name and date of birth, it does not show it was authenticated by the spouse as indicated in Section XI (SBP Spouse Concurrence). Considering the evidence and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded that the spouse's concurrence on the DD Form 2656 was not obtained on or after the date of the applicant's election. In order to justify correction...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01798

    Original file (BC-2007-01798.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. However, the applicant will have an opportunity to discontinue participation in the SBP at any time during the one-year period authorized by PL 105-85, beginning on the second...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05211

    Original file (BC-2012-05211.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Therefore, if the applicant would still like to withdraw from SBP, he can do so starting with the 25th month through the 36th month after his first eligibility to receive retired pay. ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 21 January 2013, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit C). Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 21 January 2013.